DISQUS

David R. MacIver: A follow up to yesterday’s article

  • Ao · 1 year ago
    I love you for this.
  • Erik Engbrecht · 1 year ago
    http://lemonodor.com/archives/2007/10/youre_doi...

    I think you need your own poster.
  • david · 1 year ago
    I'd be too ashamed of my beardlessness.
  • thom · 1 year ago
    I guess your article the other day could have been titled "Functional Code !=> Good Code" where "!=>" means "does not (necessarily) imply". The "!" ideally would be a cross through the =>. anyway..
  • david · 1 year ago
    It could. But the title was still accurate and the meaning was clear to people who actually bothered to read the article rather than have a kneejerk reaction to it. I stand by the title as it currently is.
  • Josh Suereth · 1 year ago
    Just wanted to say I appreciated the first post a lot. I'd be concerned If I still had the feeling that all FP programmer believe that FP code is automatically better than other styles of coding.