http://drmaciver.disqus.com/enFri, 15 Aug 2008 22:49:52 -0000http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/a-follow-up-to-yesterdays-article/#comment-6265745<p>Just wanted to say I appreciated the first post a lot. I'd be concerned If I still had the feeling that all FP programmer believe that FP code is automatically better than other styles of coding.</p>Josh SuerethFri, 15 Aug 2008 22:49:52 -0000http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/a-follow-up-to-yesterdays-article/#comment-6265744<p>It could. But the title was still accurate and the meaning was clear to people who actually bothered to read the article rather than have a kneejerk reaction to it. I stand by the title as it currently is.</p>davidFri, 15 Aug 2008 18:31:13 -0000http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/a-follow-up-to-yesterdays-article/#comment-6265743<p>I guess your article the other day could have been titled "Functional Code !=&gt; Good Code" where "!=&gt;" means "does not (necessarily) imply". The "!" ideally would be a cross through the =&gt;. anyway..</p>thomFri, 15 Aug 2008 18:10:36 -0000http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/a-follow-up-to-yesterdays-article/#comment-6265742<p>I'd be too ashamed of my beardlessness.</p>davidFri, 15 Aug 2008 14:38:47 -0000http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/a-follow-up-to-yesterdays-article/#comment-6265741<p><a href="http://lemonodor.com/archives/2007/10/youre_doing_it_wrong.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://lemonodor.com/archives/2007/10/youre_doing_it_wrong.html">http://lemonodor.com/archiv...</a></p><p>I think you need your own poster.</p>Erik EngbrechtFri, 15 Aug 2008 14:26:14 -0000http://www.drmaciver.com/2008/08/a-follow-up-to-yesterdays-article/#comment-6265740<p>I love you for this.</p>AoFri, 15 Aug 2008 13:06:05 -0000